Consult this link to return to our home page Consult this link for information regarding our Company Consult this link for contact details regarding our products and services Consult this link for details regarding our interstate dealers Consult this link for further information regarding our products lines Consult this link for information regarding cranes service and repairs Consult this link for informationr regarding cranes spare parts Consult this link to view our site map Image of CRANES HISTORY- Panama Canal

Image of CRANE EQUIPMENT - PANAMA CANAL header

CRANES (MACHINE HISTORY) PANAMA CANAL

ORIGINS OF MODERN DAY CRANES

Cranes are lifting machines equipped with a winder, wire ropes or chains and sheaves that can be used both to lift and lower materials and to move them horizontally. Put in basic terms cranes use one or more simple machines to create mechanical advantage to enable the movement of loads beyond the normal capability of a human.

The principles of operation of today's cranes is taken for granted, however, we thought you might be interested in learning a bit about the history of cranes and their development into the modern age of technology. Cranes have held an important place in history since the early beginnings of civilisation.  They have been used extensively to construct buildings which are a testimony to the achievements of mankind.  Their invaluable contribution in the construction industry has made the impossible, possible. 

Throughout the history of mankind, cranes in one form or another have been used to assist in lifting items of great weight. There are various photographs of cranes used in the construction of the Panama Canal that assisted in the performance of this incredible feat of engineering.  We hope you enjoy the information provided in this section of our site. 

CRANES AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE PANAMA CANAL 

FUTURE EXPANSION OF THE PANAMA CANAL

The Third Set of Locks Project is a megaproject that will expand the Panama Canal. The expansion will be greater than at any time since the canal's construction. The Panama Canal Authority proposed the project after years of study. Panamanian President Martín Torrijos presented the plan on April 24, 2006 and Panamanian citizens approved it in a national referendum by 76.8% of the vote on October 22, 2006. The project will double the canal's capacity and allow more traffic.

The project will create a new lane of traffic along the Canal by constructing a new set of locks. Details of the project include the following integrated components:


* Construction of two lock complexes—one on the Atlantic side and another on the Pacific side—each with three chambers, which include three water-saving basins;
* Excavation of new access channels to the new locks and the widening of existing navigational channels; and,
* Deepening of the navigation channels and the elevation of Gatun Lake’s maximum operating level.[1]

As stipulated by the Panamanian Constitution, any project to expand the Canal had to be approved by the Cabinet, by the National Assembly and by a referendum. On Friday, July 14, 2006, the National Assembly unanimously approved the proposal. In addition, the Assembly passed a law mandating a national referendum on the proposal. The Panama Canal expansion referendum was held on October 22, 2006, the first Sunday more than 90 days after National Assembly approval.

On September 3, 2007 the Panama Canal expansion project officially started. Panama's president Martín Torrijos stated that the Canal will generate enough wealth to transform Panama into a First World country. The president also announced that the canal will also industrialise the country when the expansion projects begin.  The project is also expected to reduce poverty by about 30%, resulting in an 8% poverty rate in Panama afterwards.

PANAMA CANAL SHIPPING CAPACITY

The capacity of the Panama Canal is determined by a number of factors, of which the most important is the size of the locks that raise and lower ships as they pass through the canal.

The smallest dimensions of the locks are 110 ft (33.53 m) wide, 1,050 ft (320.04 m) long, and 85 ft (25.91 m) deep. Because of clearance issues, the usable sizes are somewhat smaller (for example, the maximum usable length of each lock chamber is about 1,000 ft (304.8 m). The maximum size of the ships that can transit the canal is known as the Panamax.

Since the 1930s, all of the Canal widening studies have determined that the most effective and efficient alternative to enhance Canal capacity is the construction of a third set of locks, with bigger dimensions than those of the locks built in 1914. In 1939, the United States initiated the construction of locks designed to allow the transit of commercial and war ships, whose dimensions exceeded the size of the existing locks.

In 1942, after advancing the excavations significantly, the Americans suspended the third set of locks project because of the outbreak of World War II. In the 1980s, the tripartite commission formed by Panama, Japan, and the United States took up the issue again, and like the Americans in 1939, determined that a third set of locks with larger lock chambers was the most appropriate alternative for increasing Canal capacity. Today, the studies developed by the Panama Canal Authority (ACP) as part of its Master Plan, with a horizon to the year 2025, confirm that a third set of locks, larger than those existing now, is the most suitable, profitable and environmentally responsible way to increase Canal capacity and allow the Panamanian maritime route to continue to grow.

Throughout its history, the Canal has continually transformed its structure and adjusted to trade requirements and international maritime transport technologies. In this manner, the Canal has managed to increase its competitiveness in a sustainable manner.

TRAFFIC VOLUME IN THE PANAMA CANAL

On the basis of ACP's projections, during the next 20 years, cargo volume transiting the Canal will grow at an average of three percent per year, doubling 2005’s tonnage by the year 2025. As such, providing the Canal with the capacity to transit larger vessels will make it more efficient by allowing the transit of higher cargo volumes with relatively fewer transits and less water use. 

Historically, the dry and liquid bulk segments have generated most of the Canal’s revenues. Bulk cargo includes dry goods, such as grains (corn, soy and wheat, among others), minerals, fertilizers, coal, and liquid goods, such as chemical products, propane gas, crude oil and oil derivatives.

Recently, the containerized cargo segment has replaced the dry bulk segment as the Canal’s main income generator, moving it to second place. On the other hand, the vehicle carriers segment has become the third income generator, replacing the liquid bulk segment. Shipping industry analysis conducted by the ACP and top industry experts indicate that it would be beneficial to both the Canal and its users to expand the Canal because of the demand that will be served by allowing the transit of more tonnage.

The question is, however, whether the trend upon which the Panama Canal Authority makes those projections can continue for a generation. The growth in Panama Canal usage over the past few years has been almost entirely driven by increased U.S. imports from China passing through the canal en route to ports on the U.S. East and Gulf Coasts.

It is increasingly recognised in both the United States and China that this imbalance in trade is unsustainable and will be reduced in some sort of adjustment in the coming years, though it is important to note that any such imbalance need not be made up by physically shipped goods, but could be made by other trade such as intellectual property as China upgrades its intellectual property protection laws.

The ACP, however, presumes that it will not only not be adjusted, but will continue to grow for a generation as it has for the past several years. One of the central points of the canal expansion proposal's critics, most prominently made by former canal administrator Fernando Manfredo, is that it's unrealistic to attempt to predict canal usage trends over a generation, most improbable to expect that U.S. imports from China will continue to grow as they have the past few years over a generation, and irresponsible to bet Panama's financial future on such a projection.

COMPETITION

The most direct competition to the Canal is from alternative routes which present options for the transport of cargo between the same geographical points of origin and destination. The two main competitors of the Panama Canal are the U.S. intermodal system and the Suez Canal.

According to the ACP, the growing trend to use Post-Panamax container ships in transcontinental routes competing with the canal is irreversible. The main ports and merchandise distribution centers in these routes are investing in capacity, location, and maritime and land infrastructure to serve these vessels and handle their cargo volumes.

If this trend continues, by the year 2011, approximately 37% of the capacity of the world’s container ship fleet will consist of vessels that do not fit through the canal, and a great part of this fleet will be placed in routes that compete with Panama, such as the transpacific–intermodal route and the Suez Canal route.

The proposal states that strengthening its competitive position will allow the canal to accommodate demand and serve its customers. If the canal were to have the capacity to serve the growing demand, Panama could be transformed into the most important connectivity hub in the continent by joining together at the isthmus the north–south continental routes with the east-west transcontinental routes.

Accordingly, the canal will continue to be viable and competitive in all of its routes and segments, and contribute significantly to Panama’s development and growth while maintaining its position as one of the main world trade routes

SCOPE OF THE PROJECT

The Canal today has two lanes each with its own set of locks. The proposal consists of adding a third lane through the construction of lock complexes at each end of the Canal. One lock complex will be located on the Pacific side to the southwest of the existing Miraflores Locks. The other complex will be located to the east of the existing Gatun Locks. Each of these new lock complexes will have three consecutive chambers designed to move vessels from sea level to the level of Gatun Lake and back down again.

Each chamber will have three lateral water-saving basins, for a total of nine basins per lock and 18 basins total. Just like the existing locks, the new locks and their basins will be filled and emptied by gravity, without the use of pumps. The location of the new locks uses a significant portion of the area excavated by the United States in 1939 and suspended in 1942 because of the start of World War II. The new locks will be connected to the existing channel system through new navigational channels.


The new lock chambers will be 1,400 ft (426.72 m) long, by 180 ft (54.86 m) wide, and 60 ft (18.29 m) deep. They will use rolling gates instead of miter gates, which are used by the existing locks. Rolling gates are used in almost all existing locks with dimensions similar to those being proposed, and are a well-proven technology. The new locks will use tugboats to position the vessels instead of locomotives. As in the case of the rolling gates, tugs are successfully and widely utilised for these purposes in locks of similar dimensions.

According to the plan, a 3.2 km (2.0 mi)-long access channel will be excavated to connect the new Atlantic locks with the existing sea entrance of the Canal. To connect the new Pacific-side locks with the existing channels, two new access channels will be built:

  • The north access channel, which will connect the new Pacific-side lock with the Gaillard Cut, circumventing Miraflores Lake, and which will be 6.2 km (3.9 mi) long;
  • The south access channel, which will connect the new lock with the existing sea entrance on the Pacific Ocean, and which will be 1.8 km (1.1 mi) long (see figure 5). The new channels will be at least 218 meters (715 ft) wide, both on the Atlantic and Pacific sides, which will permit Post-Panamax vessels to navigate in these channels in a single direction at any time.

Gatun Lake raised 1.5 feet (0.46 m):

All Canal elevations are referred to Precise Level Datum (PLD), which is close to Atlantic and Pacific entrance mean sea level. The maximum operational level of Gatun Lake will be raised by approximately 0.45 meters (1.5 ft) — from the present PLD level of 26.7 meters (87.5 ft) to a PLD level of 27.1 meters (89 ft). Combined with the widening and deepening of the navigational channels, this component will increase Gatun Lake’s usable water reserve capacity and will allow the Canal’s water system to supply a daily average of 165,000,000 US gal (625,000,000 L; 137,000,000 imp gal) of additional water. This additional water volume is enough to provide an annual average of approximately 1,100 additional lockages without affecting the water supply for human use, which is provided from Gatun and Alhajuela Lakes.

We hope you have enjoyed the information provided on these pages regarding the Panama Canal and the history of cranes used in its construction.  There are various other sections in our cranes history pages that have photographs and information of cranes used in the construction of the Hoover Dam and the Empire State Building that might be of interest too.  Please return to our cranes history main page for to this information.

bullet

Consult this link to return to our Cranes History main page

bullet

Consult this link to view our CRANES SALES range of products

 

Home  About Us  Contact Details  Dealers  Products  Spare Parts  Service-Repairs   Site Map

To find items quickly that may be of interest to you, please consult our search facilities link below or our site map. 

Search our site History of the Crane Used Equipment Earth Moving

AUSTRALIAN CRANE & MACHINERY PTY. LTD.
42 Glenbarry Road,
CAMPBELLFIELD.  Vic. 3061
AUSTRALIA

Tel:  +61 (03) 9357 7524
Fax: +61 (03) 9357 7521

To contact us generally regarding any information or advice you may require, please telephone or fax us.  You can also electronically mail us with your enquiries.
Site Designed by Ozcraft Design  Copyright © 2009  Australian Crane & Machinery Pty. Ltd.   Click here to add ACM to your favorites 

CRANES (MACHINE HISTORY) PANAMA CANAL